HealthCred · Federal Procurement Briefing · GSA
Strictly Confidential · April 2026
Confidential · Government Briefing · Early Discussion — Not a Formal Proposal
Carrier-Funded Model No New Appropriations Structured Oversight Controls Prepared for Paul Ingrassia · GSA

Private-Sector Compliance
Infrastructure for
Correctional Enrollment
and Payment Integrity.

A structured execution pathway for carrying out existing ACA/CMS requirements in correctional settings — carrier-funded, field-deployed, and ready for federal evaluation. This briefing is for routing, relevance assessment, and federal pathway identification only.

1.5M
Ineligible enrollments terminated by CMS, 2024
~$10B
Annualized savings from enforcement — documented federal exposure
65+
Facilities under active contract across FL, GA & AL — operating now
$0
Direct cost to government under the carrier-funded model
Scroll to Explore ↓
Prepared for Paul Ingrassia · General Services Administration · April 2026 · Strictly Confidential01
Why This Matters Now

Program Integrity Is a Federal Priority.
Correctional Enrollment Is an Unmanaged Gap.

HealthCred is a carrier-funded program-integrity control layer for correctional enrollment — built to help government execute existing ACA/CMS requirements where standard communication-dependent workflows are difficult to execute consistently in security-first, resource-constrained correctional settings.

1.5M
Ineligible Enrollments Terminated
CMS ended premium subsidies for 1.5M people found ineligible or enrolled without authorization. (CMS, 2024)
~$10B
Annualized Savings from Enforcement
Confirming improper enrollment is a measurable, ongoing federal exposure — not a theoretical risk. (CMS, 2024)
75%
SEP Verification Standard
CMS finalized a 75% pre-enrollment SEP verification standard — re-proposed after litigation — signaling tighter documentation expectations. (CMS, 2025–2026)
2024
CMS terminates 1.5M ineligible enrollments. ~$10B annualized savings documented.
2025
75% pre-enrollment SEP verification standard finalized by CMS.
2026
Rule re-proposed after litigation. Documentation and verification expectations persist and tighten.

A Defined Execution Gap — Not a Policy Concept

Existing rules are clear. Custody-status changes trigger eligibility consequences under ACA §1312(f)(1)(B). The gap is execution — correctional environments lack a consistent, auditable mechanism to act on those rules.

A Known Cost Exposure — Not a Theoretical Risk

When eligibility changes go undocumented in correctional settings, improper payments continue and counties absorb avoidable costs. The exposure is measurable and ongoing.

An Operating Solution — Not an Early Concept

HealthCred is already operating in the field — with documented fiscal outcomes and sheriff-validated operations across Florida, Georgia, and Alabama.

Same rules. Different environment. Better execution. The question is not whether the gap exists — it is which office should lead formal evaluation of an existing, operating solution designed to close it.
Sources: CMS Exchange Program Integrity Fact Sheet (Jan. 2026); CMS Benefit and Payment Parameters Final Rule (2025); ACA §1312(f)(1)(B); 45 CFR §155.305(a)(2).02
The Execution Gap

Standard Enrollment Processes Were
Not Designed for Correctional Environments.

Six structural failures make compliance difficult to achieve and harder to document — in an environment standard CMS-aligned workflows were not designed for. Correctional environments are security-first, communication-constrained, and operationally high-friction.

Fragmented Identity Verification

Facility records, eligibility data, and enrollment systems are rarely connected. No unified identity layer exists across most county jails today.

Inconsistent Consent Capture

Consent is often verbal or recycled — neither reliably supports CMS audit expectations. Multi-party consent workflows are difficult to execute where communication is constrained.

Limited Member Review

Members rarely confirm application data before submission, creating misrepresentation exposure. Scheduling and movement constraints make standard review steps impractical.

Operational Chaos at Key Events

Intake, sentencing, movement, and release create disruptions that standard processes cannot accommodate. Standard outreach workflows are often impractical to execute.

Weak Documentation Trails

Manual processes produce incomplete records that cannot support federal oversight. Without structured documentation, audit response is slow, incomplete, or impossible.

Poor Audit Response Capability

Without structured records, facilities cannot respond to CMS, OIG, or carrier inquiries effectively — turning documentation gaps into material compliance exposure.

657,500
People Held in Local Jails
Midyear 2024. (BJS)
7.9M
Annual Jail Admissions
Among the highest-churn enrollment environments in the country. (BJS)
69%
Unconvicted at Midyear 2024
Requiring careful, documented custody-status handling — not categorical treatment. (BJS)
This is not a request for exceptions or weaker safeguards. It is a structured pathway for executing existing eligibility, consent, and documentation requirements in an environment where standard workflows are difficult to apply consistently.
Sources: CMS Consent and Documentation Requirements; 45 CFR §155.220; NCCHC Standard J-E-10; Bureau of Justice Statistics, Jail Inmates at Midyear 2024.03
The HealthCred Solution

A Documented Control Layer
Built for Controlled Environments.

HealthCred provides a structured execution pathway for carrying out existing eligibility, consent, authorization, and documentation requirements in correctional settings — making enrollment more consistently executable, verifiable, and auditable within a security-first environment. Designed to operationalize existing requirements — not bypass them.

Identity Verification

Structured identity verification tied to available facility records. No anonymous or unverified transactions. Every action is documented and attributable.

Transaction-Specific Consent

Fresh, documented consent for each action — time-stamped and retrievable. Designed to meet CMS documentation expectations within facility constraints.

Mandatory Member Review

Member reviews application data before submission, where operationally feasible within facility constraints. No silent enrollments.

Licensed Agent Checkpoint

Every interaction involves a licensed agent with documented engagement. Creates a retrievable compliance record for each transaction.

Structured Oversight Record

A structured record per transaction — supporting audit response, consent documentation, agent attribution, and timestamp retrieval.

Release-Stage Transition Support

At or near release, a documented transition action is initiated — reenrollment support or structured handoff — where operationally feasible. Designed to reduce uncompensated care exposure.

Documented Execution Workflow
Stage 01

Intake-Stage Identity & Status Flagging

Custody-status changes are flagged at or near booking using available facility records — initiating eligibility-consequence handling within a high-churn, resource-constrained intake environment.

Stage 02

Consent and Member Review — When Operationally Feasible

Where facility context allows, transaction-specific consent is obtained and the enrollee reviews application data before submission. A licensed agent is documented at each interaction.

Stage 03

Enrollment Action & Structured Documentation

Enrollment or eligibility action is executed through the appropriate Exchange or carrier pathway. A structured oversight record is generated — designed to support audit response within a security-first environment.

Stage 04

Release-Stage Transition Support

At or near release, a documented transition action is initiated — reenrollment support or structured handoff — where operationally feasible. Reduces uncompensated care exposure at the county level.

HealthCred is designed to operationalize existing requirements — not bypass them. It makes existing ACA/CMS consumer-protection and program-integrity standards more consistently executable in correctional environments. Full control-layer architecture is reserved for protected diligence.
Sources: CMS Agent and Broker Requirements; 45 CFR §155.220; CMS Consent Documentation Standards; ACA §1312(f)(1)(B).04
Traction & Proof

Already Operating in the Field.
Documented Outcomes. Not a Concept.

HealthCred is operating across large, mid-size, and small correctional facilities in Florida, Georgia, and Alabama — with documented fiscal outcomes and contracts directly with sheriffs and sheriff-led jail authorities. This is not a pilot. This is a live, contracted deployment.

Florida's County-Jail Footprint
Operating across nearly half of Florida's 67 county jails. Sheriff-contracted, not regional scale.
65+
Facilities Under Contract
FL / GA / AL active coverage across large, mid-size, and small facilities.
Direct
Sheriff-Contracted Operations
Contracts directly with sheriffs and sheriff-led jail authorities. Operational partnerships, not vendor relationships.
Documented County Savings at Every Scale
$5.9M
Lee County, FL
Documented county savings. Large-scale facility. Live deployment.
$657K
Flagler County, FL
Documented county savings. Mid-size facility.
$127K
Bradford County, FL
Documented county savings. Small facility. Savings at every scale.
Nearly half of Florida's county-jail footprint — contracted directly with sheriffs and sheriff-led jail authorities. This is sheriff-validated, contract-backed operational presence. Sheriff validation letters on file. Additional operating details available through protected diligence.
Sources: HealthCred internal deployment records. County savings figures represent documented outcomes in live correctional environments. Sheriff validation letters on file.05
Fiscal Impact & Federal Relevance

Documented Cost Exposure.
Existing Operating Solution. No New Appropriations Required.

The fiscal and federal case for HealthCred is not theoretical. CMS, HHS, DOJ, NACo, and BJS have all documented the gap this solution addresses. The cost exposure is measurable. The operating solution already exists. No new infrastructure or appropriations are required.

Reduced
Improper Enrollment Risk
Structured identity verification and documented consent reduce unsupported transactions reaching carriers and federal programs.
Lower
County Uncompensated Care Burden
Pre-release coverage coordination reduces medical costs counties absorb when individuals leave without insurance. Outcomes documented in live deployments.
Less
Administrative Leakage
Structured workflows reduce errors, incomplete records, and the staff burden of reconstructing documentation for oversight.
$0
Direct Cost to Government
Carrier-funded model. No implementation cost to facilities, agencies, or taxpayers under the current operating structure.
$254B+
Annual County Health & Safety Spend
U.S. counties invest more than $254 billion annually in community health systems and justice and public safety services. Unmanaged correctional enrollment can contribute to avoidable cost exposure within that broader spending environment. (NACo)
91%
Counties Operate Local Jails
Counties operate 91% of local jails in the United States — making county-level fiscal exposure from unmanaged correctional enrollment a direct and measurable federal concern. (BJS)
J-E-10
NCCHC Discharge Planning Standard
NCCHC standard requiring health insurance assistance and discharge planning prior to release — widely adopted, inconsistently executed. HealthCred is designed to operationalize it.
HealthCred is not seeking to create a new federal program or fund new infrastructure. It is an existing, carrier-funded program-integrity control layer — validated in the field, designed for evaluation within current federal pathways, by a clearly designated lead office, without new appropriations.
Sources: HealthCred internal deployment records; NACo County Finance and Expenditure Data; BJS Census of Jails; NCCHC Standards for Health Services, Standard J-E-10.06
Business Model

Carrier-Funded. No New Appropriations.
No Facility Budget Required.

HealthCred is compensated through existing carrier payment structures. Government agencies and correctional facilities do not bear direct implementation costs under the current operating model. The model is designed to align with existing federal procurement pathways and operate within current fiscal constraints, subject to applicable procurement requirements.

Carrier-Funded Operating Model

HealthCred is compensated through existing carrier payment structures. Government agencies and correctional facilities do not bear direct implementation costs. Commercial details are reserved for protected diligence.

No New Appropriations Required

The model does not require federal or state budget allocation to deploy. It operates within existing financial flows — designed for evaluation within current fiscal constraints, subject to applicable procurement requirements.

Procurement-Ready Structure

Designed to align with existing federal procurement pathways — including GSA vehicles, agency-specific contract paths, and prime contractor partnerships. Procurement details available through appropriate diligence channels.

Federal Evaluation Pathway
Step 01

Early Discussion

Routing and relevance assessment only. This briefing.

Step 02

Lead Owner Designated

Appropriate federal office identified and routing confirmed.

Step 03

Protected Diligence

Full technical and commercial details shared under appropriate process.

Step 04

Pilot / Procurement / Teaming

Structured evaluation within existing federal procurement pathways.

This is not a request for a new program. It is a request for a lead owner and an evaluation lane. The capability exists. The model operates. The only missing piece is the appropriate federal review through the correct procurement pathway.
Carrier-funded model. Commercial terms, payment structure, and carrier economics are reserved for protected diligence with qualified procurement review.07
Leadership & Credibility

Built by Operators, Compliance Professionals,
and Government Affairs Leaders.

The HealthCred team combines correctional operations experience, insurance-law compliance depth, and government affairs experience — with established relationships across corrections, carrier, and public-sector environments. This team has operated inside the environments HealthCred is designed to serve.

CL

Chad LaBoy

Founder, President & CEO

Operational and government affairs experience in correctional health infrastructure. Leads all federal engagement and strategic direction.

NW

Nolan Weeks

Co-Founder & Head of Implementation

Retired Jail Administrator and former County Corrections Chief. Operational credibility inside the environments HealthCred serves.

AB

Aaron Behar

Chief Legal & Operations Officer

Owner, BeharBehar. Insurance-law and compliance depth across carrier and regulatory environments. Structures all compliance architecture.

SC

Steve Casey

EVP, Operational & Government Affairs

Former Florida Sheriffs Association leader. Direct relationships across the sheriff and corrections ecosystem at the state and national level.

"

Al Lamberti — Senior Advisor. Former Sheriff of Broward County, FL. Direct law-enforcement and corrections credibility at the senior advisory level. Supports federal engagement, sheriff relationships, and operational credibility.

Compliance-First Design

Every workflow element is built against ACA, CMS, and carrier compliance requirements. No shortcuts, no bypasses.

Audit-Supportive Architecture

System design prioritizes record integrity, timestamp retrieval, and consent documentation — built for federal oversight environments.

Role-Separated Controls

Licensed agent, member review, and consent capture are structurally separated — not collapsed into a single unverifiable action.

Leadership backgrounds and credentials available for verification upon request through an appropriate diligence process.08
The Ask

We Would Value Your Perspective on the Most Appropriate
Federal Pathway for Formal Evaluation.

HealthCred is already operating in the field — deployed, contracted, and generating documented outcomes. The remaining question is which office should lead formal evaluation, and through which pathway. This briefing is a routing and relevance document, not a full disclosure.

01

Federal Owner Identification

Designate the appropriate lead federal office for evaluation — whether CMS, HHS OIG, DOJ, or a state-federal partnership authority. GSA's role is procurement routing, not clinical or compliance evaluation.

02

Evaluation Lane Opened

A formal evaluation lane opened within existing federal pathways. Full technical architecture, compliance documentation, and commercial details are shared under appropriate protected diligence protocols.

03

Protected Diligence

Technical, data, commercial, and implementation details shared under appropriate process with qualified federal counterparts. HealthCred is prepared to provide additional materials upon request.

04

Pilot / Procurement / Teaming

Structured evaluation within existing federal procurement pathways. HealthCred is ready to operate as a prime, sub, or SME partner — whatever the procurement structure requires. No new appropriations needed.

Prepared for

Paul Ingrassia

General Services Administration

This briefing is an early discussion document — intended for routing, relevance assessment, and federal pathway identification only. It is not a technical diligence package, a formal proposal, or a full implementation disclosure. HealthCred is an existing, operating company — not a concept. Real operating details are intentionally withheld at this stage. The next step is protected diligence with the appropriate federal owner.

Chad LaBoy
Founder, President & CEO
chad@healthcred.com · www.healthcred.com
Next Step
Schedule a Routing Call
30 minutes. No technical preparation required. Routing and relevance only.
The Closing Position
HealthCred is not asking government to create a new program. It is an existing, carrier-funded program-integrity control layer. The ask is simple: designate a lead owner and an evaluation lane.
Contains confidential commercial information of HealthCred Care, LLC. Shared solely for discussion and evaluation. No license or other rights are granted by this disclosure. Not a formal proposal, offer, or solicitation.09